← Blog

Heart Failure Diagnosis: NYHA Classification and Echocardiogram Insights on Ejection Fraction

Heart failure is a complex clinical condition that requires precise heart failure diagnosis for appropriate management. The NYHA classification (New York Heart Association) and imaging tests are fundamental tools in assessing the severity of heart failure and planning treatment. In this article, we will explore how these tools integrate into the diagnostic process and their clinical relevance.

Middle-aged Hispanic patient in a cardiology clinic, sitting on an examination table and wearing a hospital gown. A Hispanic female doctor, dressed in a white coat with a stethoscope, holds a tablet displaying an echocardiogram. On the wall, a diagram of the NYHA classification for heart failure is visible. The setting is professional and reassuring, emphasizing heart failure diagnosis and ejection fraction assessment.

NYHA Classification and Its Role in Diagnosis

The NYHA classification is a widely used system for evaluating the severity of heart failure based on the patient's symptoms during physical activity. This classification is divided into four classes, from class I, where there is no limitation of physical activity, to class IV, where symptoms are present even at rest. This tool is crucial for determining the functional status of the patient and guiding therapeutic decisions [1].

Moreover, the NYHA classification has been utilized in studies to correlate with other clinical and imaging markers. For instance, it has been shown that liver stiffness measured by ultrasound increases with the NYHA class in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction [2]. Additionally, the combination of echocardiography and NT-pro BNP levels has proven effective in assessing the NYHA class and prognosis in diastolic heart failure [3].

Imaging Tests in Heart Failure Diagnosis

Imaging tests are essential for the diagnosis and evaluation of heart failure. The echocardiogram is the most commonly used imaging technique, providing detailed information about the structure and function of the heart, including the ejection fraction, which is a key indicator of ventricular function [4].

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography are also valuable tools, especially in complex cases or when a more detailed assessment of cardiac anatomy is required. These techniques allow for precise evaluation of ventricular function, the presence of myocardial scars, and other structural abnormalities [5].

In patients with advanced heart failure, the assessment of pulmonary perfusion using SPECT has been shown to be useful in correlating with improvements in the NYHA classification after cardiac resynchronization therapy [6].

Conclusions

The diagnosis of heart failure is a multidimensional process that greatly benefits from the integration of the NYHA classification and imaging tests. These tools not only help assess the severity of the disease but also guide treatment and patient follow-up. The combination of clinical and imaging methods provides a comprehensive view of the patient's status, allowing for more effective and personalized management of heart failure.

Referencias


Created 2/1/2025