← Blog

Acute Kidney Injury vs. Chronic Kidney Disease: Distinguishing Through Laboratory Tests and Creatinine Levels

Image of a Hispanic physician in his 40s in a modern laboratory, examining two test tubes labeled 'Acute Kidney Injury' and 'Chronic Kidney Disease.' In the background, a computer screen displays data on renal function tests, including creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rate, alongside a renal ultrasound image.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are two clinical entities that, while sharing some characteristics, require distinct diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The distinction between these conditions is crucial for appropriate patient management and is largely based on laboratory tests. In this article, we will explore how laboratory tests, such as the measurement of creatinine and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), along with renal ultrasound, can aid in differentiating between AKI and CKD.

Distinction between AKI and CKD through Laboratory Tests

AKI is characterized by a rapid decline in renal function, typically in response to an acute event such as sepsis or exposure to nephrotoxins. In contrast, CKD is a progressive and chronic process that results in a gradual loss of renal function. The measurement of serum creatinine is a fundamental tool for assessing renal function in both cases. However, creatinine alone may not be sufficient to distinguish between AKI and CKD, as it can be elevated in both conditions.

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated from serum creatinine, provides a more accurate measure of renal function. In AKI, the GFR may decrease rapidly, whereas in CKD, the decline is more gradual. Additionally, the recovery of GFR after an episode of AKI can be an important prognostic indicator.

Renal ultrasound is another valuable tool in the evaluation of renal function. In AKI, the kidneys often appear normal or enlarged, while in CKD, the kidneys tend to be reduced in size and exhibit chronic structural changes. Ultrasound can help identify these morphological differences, providing additional information for differential diagnosis.

Conclusions

The distinction between AKI and CKD is essential for appropriate clinical management and is based on a combination of laboratory tests and imaging techniques. The measurement of creatinine and glomerular filtration rate, along with renal ultrasound, are key tools for differentiating between these two conditions. Understanding these differences enables physicians to implement more effective treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Referencias


Created 6/1/2025